Every builder is checked by a person.
No software decides who joins. Reviewers look at real work, talk to the builder and mark each check against a written rubric. A builder only appears to clients after a person marks them verified.
The checks
Eligibility
A real independent business, somewhere we can pay them, with relevant experience.
A person checks thisLive work
A screen share of a system running in production, plus a redacted contract or invoice.
A person checks thisTechnical interview
A reviewer asks how the system was built, how it fails and how keys and data are protected.
A person checks thisPractical test
A 90-minute task on made-up orders, then a live change. Unclear orders must go to a person.
A person checks thisClient simulation
A short mock first meeting, then a one-page scope in plain words.
A person checks thisReferences
Two calls with past clients, reached through their own company contacts.
A person checks thisFinal decision
A person reviews everything and decides.
A person checks this
After verification
A second reviewer checks the handover on each builder's first project. We can pause a builder if the quality drops, and any past work they change is checked again before it goes back on their profile.
How proposals are chosen
Filters use facts each builder has declared: tools, languages, project sizes and availability. Those who fit are offered in turn, with the builder proposed longest ago first. Proposals use no scores and no AI ranking. A person approves each shortlist.
Ready to fix this?
Tell us what you need. A person will read it and propose up to three checked builders.